Sun AM 99er Pairs Morn Session June 29, 2014
Scores after  6 rounds  Average:   48.0      Section  D  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C     A     B     C
  4   62.50   60.00  B   1     1           1     1          1.36(OA) Pamela Meckenstock - Judy Macarthur
  1   57.81   55.50  A   2                 2                1.02(OA) Jon Greenfield - Lorelei Greenfield
  5   54.69   52.50  B         2           4     2          0.85(OB) Barbara Roupe - George Roupe
  3   40.10   38.50  B                                               Jackie Hiatt - William Dougherty
  2   34.90   33.50  C                                               Marcia Thompson - Richard Thomson

Sun AM 99er Pairs Morn Session June 29, 2014
Scores after  6 rounds  Average:   48.0      Section  D  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C     A     B     C
  1   55.63   53.40  A   1                 3                0.77(OA) Joanne Lewin - Dee Brown
  5   51.88   49.80  B   2     1                 3          0.64(OB) Robert Kahn - Christine Kahn
  2   50.63   48.60  C        2/3    1          4/5         0.42(OB) Evelyn Katchman - Shirley Negrin
  6   50.63   48.60  B        2/3               4/5         0.42(OB) Gary Lipe - Jayne Lipe
  3   46.25   44.40  B                                               Judy Tanigami - Hide Tanigami
  4   45.00   43.20  C                                               Ada Kriegman - Myra Cohen

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
A 5 4 3
J 7 6 4 2
J
8 5 3
K Q J 10 7
A K 9 3
Q 2
J 7
N
WE
S
9 6 2
Q 10 8
K 10 8 7
K Q 6
8
5
A 9 6 5 4 3
A 10 9 4 2

EW 4N; EW 3; EW 1; NS 1; S 1; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−1504.000.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 1-Lewin-Brown
2 W21103.001.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
2 W31401.003.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 W31401.003.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
3 W31401.003.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
A J 9 4 2
K 9 6
Q 5 3
J 7
Q 8 5 3
A 10 8 7 4
J 9
A K
N
WE
S
K 7
3 2
K 10 6 4
Q 10 9 8 2
10 6
Q J 5
A 8 7 2
6 5 4 3

EW 3; EW 1N; EW 1; EW 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 N−11004.000.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
1 NTW21202.501.501-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 1-Lewin-Brown
2 NTE21202.501.505-Roupe-Roupe vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
1 NTE41801.003.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
1 NTS−22000.004.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 6-Lipe-Lipe

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
K 9 4 2
A Q 8
K 10 5
K 10 6
Q J 6 5 3
6 4 3
A Q
A 7 4
N
WE
S
10 8 7
10 7 5 2
8 6 3
J 9 5
A
K J 9
J 9 7 4 2
Q 8 3 2

NS 3N; NS 5; NS 3; NS 4; NS 2; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN54604.000.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 1-Lewin-Brown
3 NTN34003.001.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
2 N31402.002.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
2 S31101.003.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
3 NTN−1500.004.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 6-Lipe-Lipe

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
Q J 9 8
Q 6
A K 9 5 3
Q 9
K 7
J 9 8 3
J
J 8 6 5 3 2
N
WE
S
A 5 4 3 2
A 10 7 4
10 8 2
10
10 6
K 5 2
Q 7 6 4
A K 7 4

NS 3N; NS 3; NS 1; EW 1; Par +600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN56604.000.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
3 NTS36003.001.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
2 NTN52102.002.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
3 N51500.503.501-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 1-Lewin-Brown
1 NTS31500.503.503-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 6-Lipe-Lipe

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
2
10 9 4
K 9 8 4 3
A K 4 2
K 10 9
Q J 3 2
J 2
Q 9 8 3
N
WE
S
A Q 7 6 5 4
A 8
7 6
J 6 5
J 8 3
K 7 6 5
A Q 10 5
10 7

NS 4; NS 2; EW 1; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−1503.500.503-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 5-Kahn-Kahn
3 E−1503.500.505-Roupe-Roupe vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
PassPass2.002.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
3 E31401.003.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 1-Lewin-Brown
2 E41700.004.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 2-Katchman-Negrin

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
K 10 8 7 2
A Q 10 8 7
A 7 3
Q J 5
K 6 5
K 8 6 5 3
9 4
N
WE
S
4
9 4 2
A J 10 7 2
Q 8 6 5
A 9 6 3
J 3
Q 9 4
K J 10 2

NS 6; NS 6; NS 5; NS 2N; Par +980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N64803.500.501-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
4 N64803.500.505-Roupe-Roupe vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
4 S54502.002.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 1-Lewin-Brown
4 N44201.003.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 5-Kahn-Kahn
4 N−1500.004.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 2-Katchman-Negrin

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
8 5
4
A K Q 9 2
A 10 6 5 3
Q J 6 3 2
A Q
J 8 6
K 4 2
N
WE
S
K 9 7
K 10 7 2
10 7 5 4 3
J
A 10 4
J 9 8 6 5 3
Q 9 8 7

NS 3N; NS 5; NS 2; NS 2; EW 1; Par +600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W−22004.000.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 N51503.001.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 1-Lewin-Brown
3 S31402.002.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
3 N41301.003.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
4 S−33000.004.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 5-Kahn-Kahn

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
10 6
A K 8 5
7
J 9 8 7 4 3
9 8 3 2
Q 10 7 4 3 2
A Q 10
N
WE
S
A Q 7
J 6
K 9
A K Q 6 5 2
K J 5 4
9
J 8 6 5 4 3 2
10

E 4; EW 3N; W 3; EW 2; NS 1; EW 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×E−35004.000.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
3 E−42003.001.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 1-Lewin-Brown
3 E−1502.002.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
3 N−31501.003.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
4 W44200.004.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 5-Kahn-Kahn

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
Q 9 7 6 3
J 10 2
K 3
K J 6
A J 5
A K 5 3
J 8 7
7 5 3
N
WE
S
K
Q 8 4
A Q 9 6 5 2
A Q 2
10 8 4 2
9 7 6
10 4
10 9 8 4

EW 7N; EW 7; EW 7; EW 5; EW 3; Par −2220

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E51504.000.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
4 E71903.001.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 5-Kahn-Kahn
3 W52002.002.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
5 E76401.003.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
3 NTE56600.004.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 1-Lewin-Brown

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
10 9 4
A 9 5
A 8 6 2
J 9 3
A K J 5 3
K 7 6 4
K 8 6 4
N
WE
S
8 7 6
Q
Q J 10 5 3
Q 10 5 2
Q 2
J 10 8 3 2
K 9 7 4
A 7

EW 4; EW 4; NS 1; EW 1; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 W−11004.000.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
3 W31402.501.501-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 5-Kahn-Kahn
1 W31402.501.505-Roupe-Roupe vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
2 W41701.003.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
4 W46200.004.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 1-Lewin-Brown

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
K J 4 3
A 9 4
9 6 5 4
5 4
Q 9 7 5
10
K 2
K Q 8 7 6 2
N
WE
S
10 8 6 2
7 5 3 2
A 10 7
A J
A
K Q J 8 6
Q J 8 3
10 9 3

EW 3; NS 2; EW 2; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S31404.000.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
2 S21103.001.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
4 W−1502.002.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
2 S−1501.003.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 1-Lewin-Brown
4 S−21000.004.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 5-Kahn-Kahn

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
8 5 2
K 10 9 7 4
K J 6 5
10
A 7
6 5 3 2
9 8 7 3 2
9 4
N
WE
S
K Q J 10 9 6
A 10
A Q J 7 6
4 3
A Q J 8
Q 4
K 8 5 3 2

EW 4; NS 3; EW 2N; EW 3; EW 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N46204.000.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 5-Kahn-Kahn
4 E−21003.001.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 1-Lewin-Brown
4 E44202.002.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
4 E54500.503.503-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
4 E54500.503.505-Roupe-Roupe vs 2-Katchman-Negrin

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
Q 5
9 7 6 5 4
A 7 4
A Q 2
9 8 7
A K 8
J 10 5
K J 7 5
N
WE
S
A K 2
Q
K Q 9 3
10 9 8 6 4
J 10 6 4 3
J 10 3 2
8 6 2
3

EW 4; EW 2N; EW 3; EW 1; W 1; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 E−11003.500.502-Thompson-Thomson vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
3 NTW−11003.500.504-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 5-Kahn-Kahn
1 N1802.002.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
2 NTW21201.003.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 1-Lewin-Brown
3 W41300.004.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
J 10 7 6
K Q 8 5 4
8 4
K 4
K 9 2
10 7
K 7 6 5 3 2
7 3
N
WE
S
A Q 3
A J 9
Q 10 9
Q 9 5 2
8 5 4
6 3 2
A J
A J 10 8 6

EW 2N; EW 2; NS 1; NS 1; EW 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W−1504.000.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 5-Kahn-Kahn
1 NTE1903.001.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
3 N−21002.002.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 1-Lewin-Brown
1 NTE41801.003.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
3 NTE44300.004.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
Q 3
8 6 4
A 10 9 8
A J 9 8
A K 8
A K J 5 2
K Q J 6 4
N
WE
S
J 9 7
Q 10 7
5 3 2
K 10 7 4
10 6 5 4 2
9 3
7
Q 6 5 3 2

EW 5; EW 3N; EW 5; W 2; E 1; NS 1; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W44203.500.503-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
4 W44203.500.505-Roupe-Roupe vs 1-Lewin-Brown
4 W54501.502.501-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
5 W54501.502.504-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 5-Kahn-Kahn
4 W64800.004.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 6-Lipe-Lipe

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
8 2
J 4 2
K 8 6 5 4
A J 4
A Q 9
A Q 9 8 6 3
9 3
K 5
N
WE
S
K 6 5 4
K 10
Q J 10
10 8 3 2
J 10 7 3
7 5
A 7 2
Q 9 7 6

EW 3; EW 1N; NS 2; EW 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−11003.500.501-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
4 W−11003.500.503-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
2 W41702.002.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
4 W46200.503.504-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 5-Kahn-Kahn
4 W46200.503.505-Roupe-Roupe vs 1-Lewin-Brown

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
K 7 6
J 9 6 2
10 8
A 9 8 4
A Q 10 5 4
A K 4
K 5
10 7 3
N
WE
S
9 3 2
10 8 5 3
A J 6 4
6 5
J 8
Q 7
Q 9 7 3 2
K Q J 2

EW 3; EW 2N; EW 2; NS 2; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTE−1504.000.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
3 S−1502.501.503-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
2 S−1502.501.504-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
1 W31400.503.501-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 W31400.503.502-Thompson-Thomson vs 5-Kahn-Kahn

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
6
Q 4
A 9 7 6 4 3 2
10 9 3
A 8 7 5
A K J 9 8
K J 8 2
N
WE
S
Q J 10 4 2
10 6 3
J 10 8 5
A
K 9 3
7 5 2
K Q
Q 7 6 5 4

EW 7; EW 6; EW 5N; EW 3; EW 1; Par −1510

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W44203.001.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 5-Kahn-Kahn
4 E44203.001.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
4 W44203.001.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
4 W54501.003.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
4 E75100.004.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 2-Katchman-Negrin

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
2
K J 6 5
J 9
K Q 10 8 6 3
A 10 9 6 4
8 4 2
A 7 4
J 5
N
WE
S
K 8
A Q 7 3
K Q 8 5
A 9 2
Q J 7 5 3
10 9
10 6 3 2
7 4

EW 4N; EW 4; EW 3; EW 4; Par −630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−11003.500.502-Thompson-Thomson vs 5-Kahn-Kahn
3 NTE−11003.500.504-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
3 N−21002.002.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
3 NTE36001.003.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
3 NTE46300.004.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
A 5 3 2
A J 3
A K J 10 9 7
K 9
9 8 6 2
A 9 7 5 3
8 4
N
WE
S
Q J 8 7 4
Q 10 7
K 8
6 3 2
10 6
K 5 4
Q J 10 6 4 2
Q 5

N 4N; S 3N; N 3; NS 4; S 2; NS 2; NS 2; Par +630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN46304.000.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
3 N51502.002.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 N51502.002.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
3 N51502.002.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
2 N41300.004.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 5-Kahn-Kahn

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
A Q J 6 4
Q 6 3
7
10 7 3 2
K 9 3
J 4 2
J 10 9 6 2
Q 5
N
WE
S
5 2
A K 9
A Q 8 5 3
A 9 4
10 8 7
10 8 7 5
K 4
K J 8 6

NS 2; EW 3; NS 2; NS 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N21104.000.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 1-Lewin-Brown
2 NTE21202.002.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
1 NTE21202.002.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
1 NTE21202.002.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
1 NTE31500.004.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 5-Kahn-Kahn

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
A 10 5
J 3
J 10 3
A Q 9 7 6
Q 7 4
K Q 8 7
8 5
K 5 4 3
N
WE
S
K J 3 2
9 5 4 2
K 6
J 10 2
9 8 6
A 10 6
A Q 9 7 4 2
8

NS 4N; NS 5; NS 2; NS 2; NS 1; Par +430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTN41804.000.005-Roupe-Roupe vs 5-Kahn-Kahn
1 NTN31502.501.501-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
2 S51502.501.504-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 S41300.503.502-Thompson-Thomson vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
3 S41300.503.503-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 1-Lewin-Brown

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
K 8 3
K Q
J 10 8 6 5 4
A 5
A 9 7 2
7 6 2
7 3 2
K 9 6
N
WE
S
Q 10 6
A 9 8 5 4
K Q
8 4 3
J 5 4
J 10 3
A 9
Q J 10 7 2

NS 2N; NS 3; NS 2; NS 1; W 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E−22004.000.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 N51502.501.501-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
2 NTN31502.501.505-Roupe-Roupe vs 5-Kahn-Kahn
2 N31101.003.002-Thompson-Thomson vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
3 N−11000.004.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 1-Lewin-Brown

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
9 8
A Q 8 3
Q 10 8 5
K 6 5
4 3
J 6 5 4 2
A J 9 7 4
3
N
WE
S
A K 6
K 9 7
K 6 2
A J 8 4
Q J 10 7 5 2
10
3
Q 10 9 7 2

EW 4; EW 4; EW 1N; NS 1; NS 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−42004.000.004-Meckenstock-Macarthur vs 3-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 NTE−31503.001.001-Greenfield-Greenfield vs 2-Katchman-Negrin
3 NTE−21001.502.502-Thompson-Thomson vs 4-Kriegman-Cohen
3 NTE−21001.502.505-Roupe-Roupe vs 5-Kahn-Kahn
3 ×S−23000.004.003-Hiatt-Dougherty vs 1-Lewin-Brown